Albert F. Calvert's Royal Palaces of Spain moves methodically from the Escorial—described as a pile 'worthier of an Egyptian Pharaoh'—to the airy gardens of Aranjuez, where the Tagus river curves through a 'genuine oasis.' The book's structure is straightforward: seven chapters, each devoted to a single palace, with a preface that frames the work as a series of 'explanatory notes and chronological data' accompanying 164 illustrations. Yet within this orderly framework, Calvert repeatedly contrasts the personalities of the monarchs who shaped these residences, from Philip II's 'sombre personality' stamped on the Escorial to the lighter monarchy revealed at La Granja and Aranjuez.
From Granite to Gardens
The book opens with the Escorial, a 'gloomy pile' that Calvert links directly to Philip II. The description emphasizes mass and severity: the palace is a 'monastery-palace' where the king's 'sombre personality' is 'conspicuously and indelibly' impressed. In contrast, the chapter on Aranjuez shifts abruptly to a landscape of 'luxurious and flourishing vegetation,' 'cascades and basins,' and 'innumerable nightingales.' This juxtaposition is not accidental. Calvert presents the palaces as expressions of royal mood: the Escorial as a monument to austerity, Aranjuez as a retreat for pleasure. The movement between these extremes—from the granite of the Escorial to the water and greenery of Aranjuez—gives the book a rhythmic quality, as if the reader is touring not just buildings but the emotional registers of Spanish monarchy.
The Recurring Motif of Water
Water appears throughout the excerpts as a structuring element. At Aranjuez, the Tagus 'describes a majestic curve' and forms 'cascades and basins.' Fountains, sprays, and the 'majestic roar' of the cascade are woven into the description of the gardens. At La Granja, the palace is known for its elaborate fountains, though the excerpt does not detail them. Even at the Escorial, the arid setting is noted: Philip II chose Aranjuez 'almost as if to temper with the gay picture the gloomy melancholy of the Escorial.' Calvert uses water to signal a shift in tone—from the dry, severe Escorial to the irrigated oasis of Aranjuez. This recurring image ties the palaces together, suggesting that the Spanish kings sought to control nature as they controlled their realms.
Art as Royal Accumulation
Calvert's descriptions of interiors focus on accumulated treasures: 'priceless chandeliers, Sèvres vases, candelabra, and clocks' at the Casa del Labrador; 'gorgeous silk embroideries and tapestries bordered with gold'; and 'Japanese vases and bronzes of great artistic value.' The text treats these objects as evidence of royal taste and power, but also as curiosities. The Casa del Labrador, a 'Labourer's Cottage' that is actually a series of boudoirs 'worthy of a Pompadour,' exemplifies the paradox. Calvert notes the gold in the balustrade, the marble busts, and the 'enormous, beautifully carved mahogany fountain.' The effect is a catalogue of opulence, but the author rarely pauses to analyze the art itself. Instead, he presents these collections as a natural extension of monarchy, a 'semi-despotic Power' that could 'accumulate' such riches.
Movement Between Palaces
The book's structure is essentially a tour: the reader moves from the Escorial to La Granja, then to El Pardo, Aranjuez, Miramar, the Alcazar in Seville, and finally the Royal Palace in Madrid. This sequence is not chronological but geographical and thematic. The Escorial represents the 'gloomy' past; Aranjuez and La Granja offer 'lighter' aspects; the Alcazar evokes 'half-Oriental' pomp; and the Madrid palace marks the 'greatest crisis' of the nation's history, with Napoleon ascending its staircase. Calvert frames each palace as a scene of 'stirring and momentous events,' but he does not narrate those events in detail. Instead, he relies on the reader's familiarity with Spanish history. The movement between palaces thus becomes a movement through historical moments, each building a stage for royal drama.
Readers approaching Royal Palaces of Spain should treat it as a guided tour rather than a critical history. Calvert's prose is descriptive, not analytical, and his judgments are often implicit in the contrasts he draws between palaces. Pay attention to the recurring images—water, gardens, art collections—and the way each chapter builds a distinct atmosphere. The book is best read sequentially, allowing the shifts in tone to accumulate. For those interested in the architecture itself, the 164 illustrations (not included in this text edition) are essential; the text alone provides only a framework for understanding these royal residences.
Rain fell against the palace windows, and inside the Escorial’s gloom felt almost alive. That heaviness—the sense of stone absorbing centuries—stayed with me long after closing the book. Later, idly tracing a crack in my own ceiling, I reached for Earthquakes — A Closer Reading. It seemed an accident, yet both books understood how the ground beneath us holds memory.