Marcantonio's 1937 pamphlet opens with William Z. Foster's introduction, which immediately establishes a parallel between the Haymarket executions of 1887 and the Sacco-Vanzetti case of 1927. Foster describes the Haymarket leaders as 'legally lynched' and links their fate to later cases, including Sacco and Vanzetti, Tom Mooney, and the Scottsboro boys. This framing sets the tone for a work that treats both events as episodes in a continuous struggle between labor and capital.
The pamphlet's structure is itself a rhetorical device: it devotes roughly equal space to each case, with a brief bridging section that quotes Vanzetti's courtroom statement. Marcantonio's own voice emerges strongly in the second half, where he identifies as an Italian and claims Vanzetti as a 'descendant of Garibaldi.' This personal stake gives the narrative an urgency that the more historical first section lacks.
Parallel Framing and Historical Continuity
Foster's introduction establishes a direct lineage from the Haymarket martyrs to the labor movement of 1937. He writes that the 'great eight-hour day national strike of 1886' led to the execution of Parsons, Spies, Fischer, Engel, and Lingg, and that their 'murder was encompassed by the same capitalist forces' that later sacrificed Sacco and Vanzetti. This framing treats both cases as examples of legal repression rather than isolated miscarriages of justice.
The pamphlet's structure reinforces this continuity: it moves from the Haymarket narrative to the Sacco-Vanzetti story without a chapter break, using Vanzetti's own words as a transition. Marcantonio quotes Vanzetti's statement that he is 'suffering because I am a radical' and 'because I was an Italian,' then immediately adds his own commentary: 'To me those words are particularly poignant. For I am an Italian.' This personal turn marks a shift from historical reportage to first-person testimony.
Voice and Personal Stake in the Sacco-Vanzetti Section
Marcantonio's narrative voice changes noticeably when he turns to the Sacco-Vanzetti case. Where the Haymarket section relies on Foster's introduction and a more detached historical tone, the second half becomes increasingly personal. Marcantonio describes Sacco and Vanzetti as 'poor Italian workers' who 'came to this country like all our countrymen in search of peace and work and plenty.' The use of 'our' signals his identification with the defendants as fellow Italian immigrants.
He also provides specific details about Vanzetti's life: his arrival in 1908, his work in mines and mills, his blacklisting after organizing a strike, and his eventual livelihood 'peddling fish to his Italian neighbors.' These concrete details ground the narrative in the texture of working-class immigrant experience. The shift from the abstract language of Foster's introduction to this particularized account marks a change in pace and register, from political analysis to biographical sketch.
Pace and Rhetorical Structure
The pamphlet's pace is uneven, reflecting its dual focus. The Haymarket section, largely through Foster's introduction, moves quickly through historical context, connecting the 1886 strike to the rise of the A.F. of L. and the C.I.O. The language is dense with political analysis: 'the great eight-hour strike movement... gave an enormous impulse to trade union organization everywhere.' The sentences are long and argumentative, building a case for historical continuity.
In contrast, the Sacco-Vanzetti section slows down. Marcantonio introduces a narrative of arrest and trial, describing the 'Mitchell Palmer's red delirium' and the 'wave of payroll robberies' that led to the defendants' capture. He includes a specific date—May 5, 1920—and details about the Slater and Merrill Shoe Factory paymaster murder. The pace becomes almost novelistic, with a clear sequence of events: arrest, discovery of radical ties, and the seven-year legal battle. This shift from argument to narrative gives the second half a different emotional weight, allowing the reader to dwell on the specifics of the case.
Readers should note that the pamphlet's brevity—just over 7,000 words—means it offers a condensed argument rather than a full history. Marcantonio assumes familiarity with the basic facts of both cases, focusing instead on their political meaning. The personal voice that emerges in the Sacco-Vanzetti section is the pamphlet's most distinctive feature, but it also limits the scope: the Haymarket martyrs receive less individual attention. For a fuller picture, readers may wish to consult longer accounts of each case, but Marcantonio's pamphlet remains a powerful example of how political writers use parallel structure and personal testimony to create a sense of historical urgency.
The rain tapped against the window that afternoon while Labor’s Martyrs sat open on my lap, its overlapping voices—Foster’s, Marcantonio’s, the dead men’s—folding into one long, wet ache. Later, drying the pages, I drifted almost by accident into Renaissance in Italy, Volume 3 (of 7) The Fine Arts — Context and Discussion. Strange, how the same hands that mourn also shape beauty.